Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Dragonbay kingdoms - test of CC3 annual 51 style

  1. #11
    Guild Apprentice
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    36

    Default

    I really do like the style of this one! I've never had any version of CC, still debating it.

  2. #12
      Diamond is offline
    Community Leader Gracious Donor
    Facebook Connected
    Diamond's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    SF,CA,USA
    Posts
    2,970

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ramah View Post
    That looks beautiful, Clercon. And it really makes a lot of difference that you took the time to lay the forests with individual trees like that, rather than using the forest texture with the massive blur around the edge. Great stuff.
    I could not agree more. Using individual trees was definitely the way to go.
    "I like a look of agony, because I know it's true."

    -Emily Dickinson

  3. #13
      Clercon is offline
    Guild Artisan Clercon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Eslöv, Sweden
    Posts
    862

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Diamond View Post
    I could not agree more. Using individual trees was definitely the way to go.
    Thanks, I agree the difference is quite big. The none individual trees felt a bit too flat.

    And JackofHearts, CC3 is definitely worth the money in my opinion. The only drawback (if you can call it a drawback) is that I think you really need the Annuals to get the most out of the program. The included styles aren't the best ones. So the end price tend to get higher then expected :-'9
    My finished maps

    Mapping Worlds (My blog about mapping)

    Imaginary maps (My facbook page devoted to mapping)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •