Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: My first attempt

  1. #1
    Guild Novice Zion Zophin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    7

    Wip My first attempt

    This is my first serious attempt at computerized cartography. I'm using Fractal Mapper 8 and I'm going to see how well I can get it to look without using any other programs. At the moment it's just a really basic map with a few different symbols laid down to see what they would look like. I added some towns to the southwest corner just get an idea of what a "dot and text" representation of a town would look like. I'm not really shooting for anything realistic, just your basic fantasy map at the moment.

    Any comments/suggestions would be appreciated.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails My first attempt-first-attempt-medium.png  

  2. #2
      Gidde is offline
    Community Leader Gidde's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    2,992

    Post

    Yay for posting your first map! I'm new around here too

    I like the shape of your coastline and the colors you've used, they're really easy on the eye.

    You may want to give the rivers a bit of a workover though ... generally they'll run from high ground (mountains, etc.) to the ocean, and many little streams will feed into them along the way. Yours seem to be doing the opposite; they're splitting on the way downhill.

  3. #3
    Guild Journeyer Feralspirit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Utah, United States
    Posts
    134

    Post

    Oh, yes. Major river problems. Let me come back to those.

    I didn't realize Fractal Mapper had Isometric Icons, or dot and text. My experience with Fractal software was Fractal Terrain (I think) and was meant, I believe, to be supplementary to other ProFantasy Software (Campaign Cartographer, City Designer, others). You might do well with this, but that will become clearer as we move forward.

    Your basic land formation looks pretty good, coastline, forest placement, and what appears to be a desert oasis (yes?).

    The large, central mountain chain, I wonder if you can vary the width a bit more (in and out, rather than gradual widening, followed by gradual thinning, black line below is example. Added note, what you have is not impossible, but I find a little less regularity more aesthetically pleasing). The mountain icons look very repetitive (more so, IMO, than anything else) and also don't seem to be overlapping very nicely (did you work them top to bottom?). I recommend starting with your largest hills on the outside (making certain they are no larger than your smallest mountains), then working up (smallest mountains, med mountains, largest mountains used sparingly for spine), unless your icon inventory is larger than the example you posted.

    Your terrain borders are very abrupt. This may be a limitation of your software, but can you soften them any? If so, a more gradual transition between colors would help, IMO. Added note, Forest borders are fine, I am talking about your mountain, hill, and desrt borders.

    Finally, your rivers... oh boy. Did you place them, or is the software responsible for that? I'm going to proceed as if you placed them. You'll need to do your southern rivers over again. In the north, there is an interesting drainage suggested (grey lines I added are implied higher land) that I like.

    In the south, your lake drains into the sea/ocean at 6 different points, that's no good. There will be only one major river flowing out of your lake, and it will go all the way to the coast. There can be any number of smaller rivers flowing into your lake (esp. from the mountains, add one or two of those,and also from the surrounding land, maybe one from Redberry, and another from the forest in the east) and into your river (as Gidde posted; smaller rivers will start on high ground and feed into your large one, your large one will not split into smaller ones). I've drawn some black circles around your splits to show what won't happen on realistic rivers.

    My first attempt-first%2520attempt%2520mediumferals-edit.png

    Ok, there are enough crits in this post, DON'T be discouraged. Work with that and see what you can come up with. It's a good start, I like the shape of your land mass, and look forward to seeing it progress.
    Doubt is an unpleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. -Voltaire

  4. #4
    Guild Novice Zion Zophin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    7

    Post

    The central chain was bugging me too. I ended up breaking it up into a chain.
    I still need to work on the overlap and repetitiveness though. But here his what I came up with the moutain formations at the moment. I'm gonna knock out the rest of the rivers and start those from scratch.

    I could probably try feathering the terrain borders or lining some different shades.

    The rivers were just me throwing them on there without really thinking about where they should have gone.

    But here his what I came up with the moutain formations at the moment. I'm gonna knock out the rest of the rivers and start those from scratch.

    Thank you for the suggestions.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails My first attempt-overland-test-3.png  

  5. #5
    Guild Journeyer Feralspirit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Utah, United States
    Posts
    134

    Post

    Huge improvement on your mountains. Still a little thick, IMO, but that is purely personal taste. Still a split in your river from lake to sea/ocean, but with a little work you can iron that out. The new layout of your mountains gives you room to play with a few river systems, which is good, and fun. Again, I look forward to seeing your next post.
    Doubt is an unpleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. -Voltaire

  6. #6
    Community Leader Facebook Connected Steel General's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ft. Wayne, IN
    Posts
    9,463

    Default

    For me the biggest problems with the mountains is the repetition of the symbols and the 'thickness'. Try varying the symbols a bit more maybe making the forms longer and narrower (think spines).

    The river anomalies have already been covered.

    Keep working at it - you're making good strides forward.
    My Finished Maps | My Challenge Maps | Ghoraja Juun, my largely stagnated campaign setting.

    Unless otherwise stated by me in the post, all work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



  7. #7
      Gidde is offline
    Community Leader Gidde's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    2,992

    Post

    I love the new shapes of the mountain ranges, although I agree with the thick/thin comments getting posted. Although I think they may only look thick to us because the symbols are relatively tiny. If you like the shape of the ranges, try a larger symbol that will fill it with less, it might help

    Great progress!

  8. #8
      Zar Peter is offline
    Guild Journeyer Zar Peter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The land without kangaroos
    Posts
    108

    Post

    Mostly what the others said, my first impression of the mountains was: Good looking symbols but a little repetitive.

    I think you'r biggest interest is the region around Korinth since this is the most detailed region in this world. I really like the hills and the colour, you could solve the problem with the splitting river there by making the source of the west flowing river in the hills north of Alder.
    Avatar by courtesy of Castaras from the GiantitP-Forums

  9. #9
      loogie is offline
    Guild Adept loogie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Strathroy, ON
    Posts
    364

    Default

    yeah, the rivers are still a little awkward. When creating rivers, remember they always travel from the smaller bodies of water to the bigger ones, looking kind of like trees. The twigs come from lakes or other gathering areas, coming together into branches, branches come together into the trunk, and the trunk then empties into the large body of water.

    So if a river will not split from a lake and have two tails running to the sea, but could possibly have two lakes, with 2 rivers coming together forming a larger river that flows to the sea.

    Hope this helps!

    I also agree that the Mts look a little wierd, and agree that a scaling or finding of larger mt icons may help fix such an issue.
    Photoshop, CC3, ArcGIS, Bryce, Illustrator, Maptool

  10. #10
      bartmoss is offline
    Publisher Gracious Donor
    Facebook Connected
    bartmoss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    895
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Agreed on both rivers and mountains - try thinning the later out a little. That way you can place them more irregularly, and hopefully it won't look as "repetitive". Very nice general shape for the continent though.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •