Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: The Dark Side of the Moon

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Post The Dark Side of the Moon

    Found this on 'Strange Maps' - it's an interpretation (look like craters maybe?) of the dark side of the moon made by NASA & the US Geological Society. This map would not have looked out of place on a Beatles and (for obvious reasons) Pink Floyd album cover, but of course it was too recent.

    Just shows how imaginative you can be when mapmaking!

    Ravs

  2. #2
    Guild Artisan töff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Fresno, California USA
    Posts
    867

    Default

    You haven't been listening to enough Pink Floyd.

    "There is no Dark Side Of The Moon, really. (As a matter of fact it's all dark.)"

  3. #3
    Community Leader pyrandon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    1,341

    Default

    I think that map underlinesw the name of the site within wich you found it. That is one strange map!
    Don
    My gallery is here
    __________________________________________________ _______
    "Keep your mind in hell, but despair not." --Saint Silouan [1866-1938]

  4. #4
    Professional Artist keithcurtis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Port Angeles, WA
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by töff View Post
    You haven't been listening to enough Pink Floyd.

    "There is no Dark Side Of The Moon, really. (As a matter of fact it's all dark.)"
    Or you've been listening to too much Pink Floyd.
    There is no dark or light side to the moon. Any given spot (with the exception of some polar areas) receives about 14 days of sunlight in turn. There is a far side, however.

  5. #5

    Default

    Ravells.
    It is an interesting image, but I would hardly call it a map. It seems to me that it violates one or more of the Five Principles that were listed in your other post. It seems to me, as well, to be too abstract to be considered a "map" in any sense of the word that we think of one.

  6. #6

    Default

    Which principle(s) do think it offends?

    I suppose a legend or key and a scale would be nice so we knew what the colours meant and the size of the area covered. Once we had that information, then the map would make sense to us?

    I just found the use of colours very pretty and the fact that it stood up well as a design despite (or perhaps because) the shapes were naturally formed.

    Also it's different, and it's nice to see the language of maps being pushed further out.

    Ravs

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Cartographist View Post
    Ravells.
    It is an interesting image, but I would hardly call it a map. It seems to me that it violates one or more of the Five Principles that were listed in your other post. It seems to me, as well, to be too abstract to be considered a "map" in any sense of the word that we think of one.
    Well - I don't think it is any "worse" than many of the false colour maps out there. As Rav's pointed out, the lack of a legend/key makes it less useful in conveying information than it could be.

    The original Wired post is here:
    http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2...st-beauti.html

    and it indicates that was made with:
    colors correlating to geological materials and phenomena
    -Rob A>

  8. #8

    Default

    Having thought about it for some time now, I guess what I meant was that it doesn't convey any information. It is an abstract image that, while pretty/interesting to look at, provides no utility.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •