Khefaria

[Sapiento]

State labels added.

[Schwarzkreuz]

Every element is simple but maximized effective. I think this map is a great example in mapping a straight idea and using even inconventional elements in a harmonic way. And the overall colors are splendid

[Lukc]

It looks good, and convincingly aged indeed!

[Sapiento]

Thank you, guys.

I added a few geographic labels, but otherwise I think this map is finished.

[wally-d-feed]

Hey Sapiento ... ausgezeichnete Karte (=outstanding map)
But I have two things to point at.

1. Did you use the word "Baronat" on purpose because it should be "Baronie"
2. There seem to be a lot of areas that don't belong to any of political entity (e.g. between "Königreich Altkhefarien", "Baronat Inapad" and "Ampuf" or right of "Republik Meshku" or especially between "Grafschaft Audande", "Amnsanische Freyschaft" and "Königreich Sulatar") which to me seems a little uncommon ... maybe these spots are not very interesting for settling or anything but at least for traderoutes ... If there's no explicit reason to not annex those areas, why wouldn't anyone annex it? And if there's some reason to not annex them like some treaty that says that noone should touch those lands or maybe a curse that lies on that lands (or whatever) ... why isn't that reason indicated in the map (eg. "Neutrales Land" or "Verfluchtes Land" or "nichtinkorporiertes Territorium")

[Sapiento]

Hey Sapiento ... ausgezeichnete Karte (=outstanding map)
But I have two things to point at.

1. Did you use the word "Baronat" on purpose because it should be "Baronie"
2. There seem to be a lot of areas that don't belong to any of political entity (e.g. between "Königreich Altkhefarien", "Baronat Inapad" and "Ampuf" or right of "Republik Meshku" or especially between "Grafschaft Audande", "Amnsanische Freyschaft" and "Königreich Sulatar") which to me seems a little uncommon ... maybe these spots are not very interesting for settling or anything but at least for traderoutes ... If there's no explicit reason to not annex those areas, why wouldn't anyone annex it? And if there's some reason to not annex them like some treaty that says that noone should touch those lands or maybe a curse that lies on that lands (or whatever) ... why isn't that reason indicated in the map (eg. "Neutrales Land" or "Verfluchtes Land" or "nichtinkorporiertes Territorium")

Danke! Thank you!

1. Baronie and Baronat are both possible.
2. I thought that the ownership of these areas is changing very often. But good ideas with 'neutral land' and the others. I will adapt the map.

[wally-d-feed]

Danke! Thank you!

1. Baronie and Baronat are both possible.
2. I thought that the ownership of these areas is changing very often. But good ideas with 'neutral land' and the others. I will adapt the map.

1. Oh! I didn't know that .. you never stop learning
2. I am always glad I can help. How about "umkämpftes Territorium"?

[Sapiento]

1. Oh! I didn't know that .. you never stop learning
2. I am always glad I can help. How about "umkämpftes Territorium"?

1.
2. Good idea.

[Schwarzkreuz]

1.
2. Good idea.

1. Is this the same as in Califat and Sultanat, where does such wordelements come from?
2. This form of areas are always difficult.

[Sapiento]

1. Is this the same as in Califat and Sultanat, where does such wordelements come from?
2. This form of areas are always difficult.

1. I'm quite sure it comes from Latin.
2. More or less, yes.

'neutralized territories' labels added.
So, now it should be finished.

Other ideas or critques?