Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Planetary night view [WIP]

  1. #1
    Guild Novice
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Paris suburbs, France
    Posts
    10

    Wip Planetary night view [WIP]

    Hello there,

    The following is a study. I never gave a try at representing planets and stellar bodies so I'm posting here for critics and advices.
    I'm using Photoshop.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	test2.jpg 
Views:	340 
Size:	699.4 KB 
ID:	17858

    The purpose is to represent the night side of a planet. I was always amazed by how Earth can look from space, night side.

    My difficulty is here to have the lights from civilization/settlements being a prominent feature. Yet not end being "too bright".

    The other difficulty I have is to represent clouds. I've tried adding a layer of white dots on which I applied a motion blur but it just make "clouds" hazy, more like a fog.
    So if anyone has suggestions...


    as a reference, here follows the work without the "lights" and shadow

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	test.jpg 
Views:	206 
Size:	477.0 KB 
ID:	17859

    Edit : the final purpose is to include the view into a "LCARS-style" (from Star Trek) with notable places being zoomed in.

    Pierre
    Last edited by kridenow; 10-19-2009 at 09:06 AM.

  2. #2
    Community Leader Gidde's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    3,098

    Default

    For the clouds, try using an actual clouds filter (Filter --> Render --> Clouds (--> Solid Noise on gimp) ), then doing a select by color with a high fuzziness/threshold on the black so that you only get the white parts (alternatively you could use the Screen layer mode). You wouldn't get great weather patterns, but it should at least look like clouds.

  3. #3
    Professional Artist Facebook Connected Coyotemax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,972

    Default

    For large scale planetary cluds, here's a few resources i use:

    http://www.noirextreme.com/earth
    http://www.oera.net/How2/TextureMaps2.htm
    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Earth-clouds.png

    noirextreme and oera.net might be particularly interesting since they have a night-side earth view to use as reference as well
    Last edited by Coyotemax; 10-19-2009 at 04:54 PM.

    My finished maps
    "...sometimes the most efficient way to make something look drawn by hand is to simply draw it by hand..."

  4. #4

    Default

    Nice images.

    A lot depends on how densely populated your world is and whether the map is meant to be a photographic image or an enhanced map.

    A photo would have much less land detail:

    http://esamultimedia.esa.int/images/..._composite.jpg

    and clouds wouldn't be seen, they would simply mask the lights.

    If your map is an enhanced representation, rather than a photo, then you can have as much land/cloud detail as you want.

    Some of your brighter areas of light seem to be too big and too bright in comparison with the Earth at night images I've googled, and your light distribution suggests that your continent interiors are uninhabited, despite the coastlines being very well populated(and perhaps too clearly delineated) the bright spot near the centre seems strangely isolated - no roads or towns linking it with the coast.

    Hope that helps.
    Mapping a Traveller ATU.

    See my (fantasy-based) apprenticeship blog at:

    http://www.viewing.ltd.uk/cgi-bin/vi...forums&sx=1024

    Look for Chit Chat, Sandmann's blog. Enjoy.

  5. #5
    Guild Novice
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Paris suburbs, France
    Posts
    10

    Post

    The clouds rendering gives a rather hazy fog over the surface.
    So, as suggested, I went (for the daylight view) with a photo of Earth clouds (now I found them, at some places, a bit "dirty grey").

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	test_f2.jpg 
Views:	207 
Size:	763.0 KB 
ID:	17885


    I dropped the idea to include clouds on the night view. Yes, it would just hide the civilization lights.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	test_f1.jpg 
Views:	132 
Size:	1.02 MB 
ID:	17886

    (I've added a field of stars, picked from internet, for the best or the worst. But now I believe it's quite the worst
    I also worked a bit on the gaussian blur to make the transition from lightside to darkside better looking)


    The distribution of light was quite problematic to me.
    The planet is completely fictionnal. I tried "extracting" a distribution of settlements (generating light) from the intermediate "lowland" layer.
    (I have a base layer, which served for the oceans, tinted in blue, a "lowland" layer, tinted in shades of green and a "highland"/mountains layer tinted in white).

    It's a selection by pixel color. The result excluded the oceans (which weren't on the layer) and the mountain (same reason).
    Because settlements tend to be coastal, I picked a color by the "coast".

    The end result was a rather large selection of pixel. When "illuminated" it made the whole planet rather luminous with much more lights, including inner lands.
    But I found it being quite "too much" to my taste so I progressively excluded the darker (dimmer) pixels which led to the concentration we see now.

    it would probably be better with another pass at population/light distribution, removing or lessening some bloats of light (they have an inner and external light), especially when there are lone and long luminous strings by coasts.

    I'm also undecided on the final opacity of the global shadow. A darker shadow makes lights the obvious feature. On the other hand, it makes the whole... just dark

    Pierre
    Last edited by kridenow; 10-20-2009 at 07:40 AM.

  6. #6
    Guild Journeyer
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    226

    Default

    I like what you've done so far. The planet looks good, I think you need to mess with the filters a bit more to give it the look you're going for, but I have to object to the background.

    There's no way that you'll ever see galaxies like that in the background at the same time you are seeing the planet. The light from the planet would completely washout the faint light that the galaxies would give off. That's assuming you could find a distance to image this planet at which would also give that magnification to the galaxies anyway.

    I know galaxies and nebulae look cool, every "syfy" image out there has them, but you're far better off realism-wise if you can find a starfield where all the stars are just pin pricks and if there are any nebulae they are about the size of one of those galaxies in the background. If you have a nebula that fills up the background it would be so faint and diffuse that you'd never be able to image it except with time lapse photography.

    Basically, if you want a background to put a planet on, it should probably look a lot like what you can see from the earth without a telescope.
    “Maps encourage boldness. They're like cryptic love letters. They make anything seem possible.”
    -Mark Jenkins

  7. #7
    Guild Novice
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Paris suburbs, France
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Actually, I just put one background to fill up the black area But it doesn't look good.
    Pinpoint stars would be far enough.

    Pierre

  8. #8

    Default

    This sounds like an interesting technique. Worthy of a tutorial when you've perfected it.
    Mapping a Traveller ATU.

    See my (fantasy-based) apprenticeship blog at:

    http://www.viewing.ltd.uk/cgi-bin/vi...forums&sx=1024

    Look for Chit Chat, Sandmann's blog. Enjoy.

  9. #9
    Guild Novice
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Paris suburbs, France
    Posts
    10

    Post

    I edited the nightside view, adding a new field of stars, toned down seriously the "glowy" (external light) effect of the civilization lights, edited manually the lights distribution (less on coast, more inland).

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	test_f3.jpg 
Views:	165 
Size:	861.6 KB 
ID:	17918

    The source from which I extracted the pixel distribution to be illuminated can't easily give me more distribution (there aren't that many different color tones).
    So I went for manual edition (my original idea was to rely only on filters, rendering and pixel selection).

    It would probably be better with a source with more contrasts and numer of tones.
    Something to remember for me

  10. #10

    Default

    Looking good.

    A couple of other 'brightness' issues, if I might suggest?

    Maybe the starfield is still overbright and distracts the eye from the planet, the stars should fade near the planet, and there would be no stars at all showing through the atmospheric glow.

    The circular atmosphere glow is a bit too bright. I think it was better in the first image.
    Mapping a Traveller ATU.

    See my (fantasy-based) apprenticeship blog at:

    http://www.viewing.ltd.uk/cgi-bin/vi...forums&sx=1024

    Look for Chit Chat, Sandmann's blog. Enjoy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •