Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: How unique is your browser?

  1. #1

  2. #2
    Guild Adept moutarde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009


    Well, according to that, I'm unique!

  3. #3
    Professional Artist Djekspek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009


    me 'appears to be unique' too ... or is it a bad thing? Now how to find out what all the things on that screen mean...

  4. #4
    Guild Artisan Facebook Connected Rythal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Toronto, Ontario


    I iz speshiul, and unik... apperently.

  5. #5


    What unique means is that your browser alone gives out enough information to track your identity. Between your loaded fonts, extensions, browser choice etc.... most people are identifying themselves, or at least their computer, everywhere they surf. For an eye opening result try the link above with and without javascript enabled.

    I am not going to be so stupid as to enter the argument of what anyone might want to hide. Rather, I am going to suggest that people consider what level of privacy makes them comfortable empowered individuals.

    Dollhouse Syndrome = The temptation to turn a map into a picture, obscuring the goal of the image with the appeal of cute, or simply available, parts. Maps have clarity through simplification.

    --- Sigurd

  6. #6


    I have no idea what this means but:

    Within our dataset of about ten thousand visitors, only one in 181 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

    Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys 7.5 bits of identifying information.
    I think being uinque is bad because it means sites can track you even if they don't know exactly who you are. It's kind of like driving a new Corvette through a run down neighborhood...they know you as "that guy in the vette". At least that's what I'm understanding them as trying to say.
    “When it’s over and you look in the mirror, did you do the best that you were capable of? If so, the score does not matter. But if you find that you did your best you were capable of, you will find it to your liking.” -John Wooden

    * Rivengard * My Finished Maps * My Challenge Maps * My deviantArt

  7. #7


    That was my take on it too but unique only among the sample tested which compared to internet users in total is tiny.

    Not that I'm overly worried. If people want to track my movelements they can be my guest. I tend to visit only about 4 or 5 sites regularly.

    I used to have Zone Alarm Pro which had an option to allow you to surf the web anonymously. I wonder if using that setting would affect the result?

  8. #8


    Not much, I suspect. Most of the information the browser is sending is necessary for it to function properly. For kicks, I tried it through an anonymizing proxy server and got only slightly better results: 1 in 18,000 rather than 1 in 110,000. And that was probably mostly due to the proxy shutting off cookies, which I usually have on.

    Incidentally, the claim of "several hundred thousand visitors" is dishonest, since if the web browser is totally unique, they reveal that only ~110,000 browsers have been tested so far. I imagine that will go up over the next few days, but still…
    Bryan Ray, visual effects artist

  9. #9
    Guild Expert Ramah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Blog Entries


    1 in 2,676 browsers have my fingerprint. Should I be scared? :S

    Is that because I have the noScript plugin for Firefox?
    Royal: I'm very sorry for your loss, your mother was a terribly attractive woman.

    My Cartographer's Guild maps: Finished Maps

    More maps viewable at my DeviantArt page: Ramah-Palmer DeviantArt

  10. #10
    Administrator Redrobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Blog Entries


    1 in 27,000 and again I am on latest FF with adblock and noscript too so I don't think that can be quite right tho I am on XPx64 which is pretty unusual I think and probably shows up in the user agent as windows V5.2. One in 181 is pretty good for anonymity but lets be fair you also send your IP which is pretty unique anyway without a proxy or TOR behind it. This thing with the number of 'bits' is a bit silly cos you cant change them in order to convey messages with it unless you had 27,000 different browsers to open connections with.

    What they ought to do after this is to publish the most common ones so we can spoof the user agent string to match.

    Also on boing the other day, did you catch that brilliant network analyzer from Berkley ? I was telling Jax about this in PM but you should all try this cos its brilliant but does convey lots of spoddy info thats a bit deep. You need to run full Java for it to work tho but in this case I think its worth it.

    EDIT -- Hardyhar, spoofed my user agent string to XP 32 bit and its down to 1 in 1330 now. Hmm I might look through my web sites logfile and see the most common one in there and change it to that instead.

    EDIT2 -- Down to 1250 with this: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
    which I think is WinXP running Firefox with .net installed. I could get an IE one I guess but Id be too ashamed to broadcast it

    To spoof UA in FF you put this "about:config" (no quotes) into the address bar, promise to be a good boy and get to the list of config items. Right click, create a new string called "general.useragent.override" in and then paste the user agent string above in as the text for it. Id stick to a proper one cos some web sites look at it and bin some of the scrapers or other weird stuff hitting it.
    Last edited by Redrobes; 01-28-2010 at 04:08 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts