Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Xara Xtreme Map-Making

  1. #1
    Publisher Gamerprinter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, IL, USA
    Posts
    3,632

    Map Xara Xtreme Map-Making

    Being different than most map-makers, and self-taught using software not intended for map-making.

    I own both CC3 and Dundjinni, but find the former to complex and difficult to learn (not user friendly at all), and the latter as a clumsy tool for map making.

    The reason I use Xara Xtreme is because it is a full graphics application - I use it for web graphics, PDF book creation, RPG maps, logo design, sign design, etc.

    When you place a mountain or tree in either CC3 or Dundjinni, you can't really go back later and make a change, unless you "undo, undo..." your way back to the object, and subsequently destroy everything you created after that object.

    With Xara Xtreme, I can go back to the first object I created, rotate it, enlarge or delete without affecting the rest of the map.

    Anyway, I've included a page on my site to show you samples of three terrain maps I've created using Xara Xtreme - check it out if you like!

    http://www.gamer-printshop.com/cartographers.html

    There's a link to a free trial download of Xara Xtreme, plus I've included to tutorial I created using Xara for map-making.

    Oh Mr. Admin - I'm posting another link, but this one is just for pics...

  2. #2
      ravells is offline
    Community Leader Gracious Donor ravells's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    10,862

    Default

    Yup, I am increasingly preferring my vector app (Serif Drawplus - which looks a lot like Xara Xtreme) to my paint app (PSP). I now tend to do most (if not all) of my work in Serif and add finishing touches in PSP. As you say, it is so much easier to make corrections and changes with vector apps. One day I hope to graduate to Illustrator but I find Serif Draw+ so easy and intuitive to use, it'll be a while yet.

  3. #3
    Publisher Gamerprinter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, IL, USA
    Posts
    3,632

    Default IMHO - Illustrator is not an upgrade

    Adobe Illustrator, although the "industry standard" for years and years, especially for professional graphics work - is a program I have, have used, and don't use anymore. IMHO - Illustrator sucks.

    Don't get me wrong its feature rich - but if you're familiar with say creating bevels in Photoshop, its not too hard, but its a multi-step process. With Serif or Xara its a one-two step process.

    Don't knock Serif or Xara because of the extremely low prices.

    Adobe products are priced way out of reality.

    Don't think you need to graduate to Illustrator - in fact, it more like getting a demotion than a graduation. Just my honest opinion.

  4. #4
      pyrandon is offline
    Community Leader pyrandon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    1,346

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gamerprinter View Post
    Adobe Illustrator, although the "industry standard" for years and years, especially for professional graphics work - is a program I have, have used, and don't use anymore. IMHO - Illustrator sucks....Don't think you need to graduate to Illustrator - in fact, it more like getting a demotion than a graduation. Just my honest opinion.
    Ouch! While I agree that the price of the Adobe products are ridiculous (they have set the cost at the demand & it seems to work for them, though silly for home users). But the people at whom these applications are aimed are industry professionals, meaning they are staking their very livelihoods on the functionality of these programs. If they were as poor as you suggest, these people would surely jump ship ASAP & find something else that works better, especially if the cost is lower.

    That being said, your assessment may be valid for the casual user or simply the graphics aficionado (of which I am one), but even then I would say the Adobe "knock offs" (such as GIMP and Inkscape) would be a more apt solution if (and only if) one has the time and patience to fight up the learning curve. Look at the Guild here, for example: almost without exception the best maps utilize one of these programs (for post-work touch-up at the very least).

    I am not knocking Serif or Xera here at all, for I'm sure they're great programs; just offering a little tempering of the vehemence of your criticism.

    Take care!
    Last edited by RPMiller; 08-08-2007 at 11:15 AM.
    Don
    GM, Westaven
    My gallery is here
    __________________________________________________ _______
    "Keep your mind in hell, but despair not." --Saint Silouan [1866-1938]

  5. #5
    Publisher Gamerprinter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, IL, USA
    Posts
    3,632

    Post I base my opinion on actual pro experience

    I base my opinion regarding Illustrator on the fact that I am a professional graphics designer. I've been working graphic design since 1981. I've been using digital graphics software since 1989. I've used Illustrator versions 7 - 10 over 6 years of use.

    They were the only show in town so they could charge premium prices. Being long established they can maintain their price range. Which doesn't mean the price is justified - especially now since there are so many high quality vector based applications out there.

    Really, the best software is whatever works best for you. If you've never tried Illustrator and are working with a budget - look at Xara Xtreme or Serif DrawPlus, long before spending $500+ for illustrator.

    If you love Illustrator, that's great! Its just I don't love Illustrator - not at all.

  6. #6
      ravells is offline
    Community Leader Gracious Donor ravells's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    10,862

    Default

    My wife works with lots of creatives in her job and I was amazed at how many professionals use Serif products in preference to or in conjunction with the 'big boys'. For me, the biggest advantage that Illustrator and PS have is that virtually every magazine or book that's published which deals with that type of application is written for PS, Illustrator and Painter users.

    Ravs

  7. #7
    Publisher Gamerprinter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, IL, USA
    Posts
    3,632

    Post Illustrator has more tutorial support

    Good Point!

    Industry standard software has far more industry support than the low-budget apps - there is no doubt that this is true.

    Kind of the reason I'm creating Tuts for Xara Map-Making, since Xara has no idea they have a map-making app (!)

    Again, I'm a different sort of bird, I never read software manuals (falls asleep after half a chapter). And I never use or read tutorials - I never think to look. I just dive into a brand new application and figure it out as I go along. I will review a function, that I can't figure out, in the software manual, but that's the only time I crack the book open.

    I love Xara, because it only took 1 afternoon to figure out the software. Granted there are a few features that I didn't discover or look for, until months later - so in a way, I'm still learning the software. But I could figure most of in one sitting and started creating maps almost immmediately.

    You're right Illustrator has more industry support. I don't support, just good software.

  8. #8
      RPMiller is offline
    Community Leader RPMiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Watching you from in here
    Posts
    3,207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gamerprinter View Post
    When you place a mountain or tree in either CC3 or Dundjinni, you can't really go back later and make a change, unless you "undo, undo..." your way back to the object, and subsequently destroy everything you created after that object.
    This is an incorrect statement regarding CC3, and I think Dundjinni as well, but I don't own it so can't vouch for the accuracy. Anyway, CC3 is a CAD application. It is entirely vector based and every object is fully editable. You better believe that you can go back and make changes at anytime.

    Quote Originally Posted by pyrandon View Post
    ... industry professionals, ... especially...
    I fixed the tags for you.
    Bill Stickers is innocent! It isn't Bill's fault that he was hanging out in the wrong place.

    Please make an effort to tag all threads. This will greatly enhance the usability of the forums.



  9. #9
    Publisher Gamerprinter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, IL, USA
    Posts
    3,632

    Post Maybe you're right about CC3...

    Maybe you're right about CC3 - I have the program and I am definitely still a newbie, I am certainly a fan of Profantasy, though.

    I've just run into that "can't go back and fix my mountain" problem on more than one occasion. Perhaps there's an easy fix, that I don't know about. It isn't obvious though, I've looked.

    Yes, CC3 is a CAD program and vector based, but the mountains I'm referring too are PNG graphic files placed in the mountains layer of CC3 not CC2.

    Because I'm a member of the CC2 Yahoo Group, I get this constant flood of endless tiny problems, operating system issues for the software. I've never seen graphics software with so many bugs before. The idea of CC3 is great, the masters using it are masterful. But the newbies trying it out, will like me run back to software I am familiar with.

    If you got a fix for CC3 objects placement issue - tell me. And I'll stand corrected.

  10. #10
      RPMiller is offline
    Community Leader RPMiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Watching you from in here
    Posts
    3,207

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gamerprinter View Post
    Maybe you're right about CC3
    Yup I am. Trust me.

    I've just run into that "can't go back and fix my mountain" problem on more than one occasion. Perhaps there's an easy fix, that I don't know about. It isn't obvious though, I've looked.

    Yes, CC3 is a CAD program and vector based, but the mountains I'm referring too are PNG graphic files placed in the mountains layer of CC3 not CC2.
    That absolutely doesn't matter. The symbol itself is still a vector based object. You can select it just like any other entity in the map.

    Because I'm a member of the CC2 Yahoo Group, I get this constant flood of endless tiny problems, operating system issues for the software. I've never seen graphics software with so many bugs before. The idea of CC3 is great, the masters using it are masterful. But the newbies trying it out, will like me run back to software I am familiar with.

    If you got a fix for CC3 objects placement issue - tell me. And I'll stand corrected.
    CC3 is in its infancy so there are going to be bugs, not to mention they are trying to do something that CAD just wasn't made to do, and yet are achieving success with each passing month. I'm on their beta team so I can attest to the fact that it is much improved before it gets to its release stage.

    As for the fix, you really haven't stated what your exact problem is. Once you do that I can probably help you. If you are talking about simply repositioning a single symbol:

    1) Click the Move button
    2) Click the edge of the symbol
    3) Click where you want to place it
    4) Right click-->Do It.

    Of course there are the shortcut keys to command line to do the above as well.
    Bill Stickers is innocent! It isn't Bill's fault that he was hanging out in the wrong place.

    Please make an effort to tag all threads. This will greatly enhance the usability of the forums.



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •