Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: ToEE - Moathouse Ground Floor and Dungeons

  1. #1
    Publisher Kepli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    58

    Post ToEE - Moathouse Ground Floor and Dungeons

    I just have to show you all these maps made by Tintagel. He used Dundjinni for the map and Photoshop for shadows.
    ToEE - Moathouse Ground Floor and Dungeons
    Also visit Dundjinni, Four Ugly Monsters, the Nook, Battlegrounds Games, Fantasy Grounds, RPTools, RPGMapShare, Eruvian, Dragon Roots, RPG Virtual Tabletop, Troll Lord Games, GameMaster Syndicate and meny, many others

  2. #2
    Guild Journeyer
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    140

    Post

    Nicely done, no doubt. Regarding the giant map on the right, I can't help but wishing that, since he had it in Photoshop anyway, he didn't do anything with the color pallette. The moat and the grass, in particular, just kind of mush into each other. The abandoned tower map has similar color value issues.

    The interior building portions of all the maps are excellent.

    loyd

  3. #3
    Community Leader RPMiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Watching you from in here
    Posts
    3,226

    Post

    Very nice overall. My nitpick would be the edge that meets the water is way to sharp. He should have used a gradient transparency that showed the ground under the water and allowed for a smoother transition, and I agree about the greens being a little too similar although on my monitor they are not distracting at all so maybe our monitors are similarly adjusted.

    Regardless that is a much nicer map than I could produce and seeing an old classic map "re-imagined" is awesome!

  4. #4
    Publisher Kepli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    58

    Post

    Weird ... the colours for the moat and the grass are totally different. Must be something on your screen settings Loydb

    Yeah, the harsh lines between grass and moat was my comment as well. He could have used some transition pieces in Dundjinni to make that a bit better, but it doesn't have a feathering tool yet. PS was only used to add some of the shadowing and light ... the rest was done in Dundjinni
    Also visit Dundjinni, Four Ugly Monsters, the Nook, Battlegrounds Games, Fantasy Grounds, RPTools, RPGMapShare, Eruvian, Dragon Roots, RPG Virtual Tabletop, Troll Lord Games, GameMaster Syndicate and meny, many others

  5. #5
    Guild Journeyer
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    140

    Post

    Well, my monitor is color-calibrated with a colorimeter every two weeks, so I'm comfortable that it's pretty accurate. The colors don't look the "same", the color values are so similar though, that it gives the overall impression of blending into each other. It's a nitpick, at best.

    loyd

    edit: Went back and looked at it again -- what's bugging me is the texture on the water and the texture of the grass are kind of similar, and makes it look like the blue and green are transparent overlays on the same terrain.

  6. #6
    Publisher Kepli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    58

    Post

    I see what you mean ... He may indeed have been better of using another texture.
    Also visit Dundjinni, Four Ugly Monsters, the Nook, Battlegrounds Games, Fantasy Grounds, RPTools, RPGMapShare, Eruvian, Dragon Roots, RPG Virtual Tabletop, Troll Lord Games, GameMaster Syndicate and meny, many others

  7. #7
    Administrator Facebook Connected Robbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    3,877
    Blog Entries
    6

    Post

    Now you just gotta send him here in person to defend himself
    Fantaseum (https://www.fantaseum.com)

    Robbie Powell - Site Admin

  8. #8

    Post

    Hello everyone!

    This is my first post, and my official "defense", heh.

    These are my first two maps that I would consider "cartography," period. They are also my first two attempts at using Dunjinni software, or photoshop, for that matter. I don't have any official training or proficiency with PS - so I am a complete n00b in this arena. You can see my other artwork on my website (use the link above). The only art I have done until now has been unplugged, with paints, brushes, etc.

    Having said that, I agree completely with the criticism so far. At the time that I created the upper floor in particular, I had Dundjinni for 3 days, and I simply didn't have any other texture for any kind of swamp. Since then I have downloaded much of the user-created textures and png art. I never knew that folks even did that kind of work! I am in the very slow process of sorting through 500+ mb of images and textures - so it might be a while until I can use any of the spiffy stuff I have found.

    I should also say that these maps are a mixture of Form and Function. That is, I initially made them for use with d20pro virtual tabletop software, for my D&D campaign. So I knew that my group would only explore the interior of the moathouse, not the swamp. It simply didn't warrant any extra time on my part. That, and I think my players would have me committed for spending 10+ hours on a map that we use for 2 hours, max...

    The water transition: Kepli is right - feathering is not an option in Dundjinni. To do the same with photoshop and my limited understanding of the software, I would have to create 2 separate images and feather them into each other? Right now, Dundjinni is limited to 32x40 squares per map, and I had to stitch 2 maps together pre-photoshop. I don't think that I'm talented enough to blend it much better without more textures (and those are coming one day!).

    I thank you all for your advice and feedback. I will use your suggestions with further maps. I'm just happy to have folks looking at my work with trained and talented eyes.

  9. #9
    Administrator Facebook Connected Robbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    3,877
    Blog Entries
    6

    Post

    The thing about this site, is I wanted it to be more about the art of cartography with a little bit of focus on the technology of it...when you label something as art, you open it up to a better form of criticism...this form of criticism, constructive, is desirable but you all knew that.

    Your map is impressive for sure...and from what I've seen, the more constructive criticism a piece gets, the more respect and "attention" its generating...welcome to the site Tintagel I look forward to seeing more of your work. Feel free also to post up some of your more traditionally drawn maps.
    Fantaseum (https://www.fantaseum.com)

    Robbie Powell - Site Admin

  10. #10
    Guild Journeyer
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    140

    Post

    Glad to have you aboard! I wasn't evaluating the map from a "is it a usable game map". I was managing editor and art director of a game company for five years, I look at it as "What would I tell the artist if he sent me this map for a book?". The interiors are great. Hope to see more of your work.

    loyd

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •