Results 1 to 10 of 159

Thread: [CWBP2] World Map construction thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guild Master Falconius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    2,727

    Default

    I like that.

    According to my poor understanding of the histogram on a sinusoidal projection of that we have 75 % water which seems good to me. I was actually going to suggest we increase the sea area between the two "halves" of the world but given that we are already 75% I don't think it's a good idea. My concern was exploration, but according to my calculations the closest piece of lands between the half's is like 3000 km apart, which is more than acceptable in terms of difficulty.

    Yes I was thinking dropbox but have never used it and so am unfamiliar with the specifics of how we would share with it.

    Edit: There are also a hell of a lot of islands as a result of my messy editing. Should we remove them or leave them?
    Edit2: Given your image is at the top resolution I think we can just use that and clean up the land edges do you have one without the notes?
    Last edited by Falconius; 08-06-2014 at 02:06 PM.

  2. #2
    Guild Grand Master Azélor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Québec
    Posts
    3,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Falconius View Post

    According to my poor understanding of the histogram on a sinusoidal projection of that we have 75 % water which seems good to me. I was actually going to suggest we increase the sea area between the two "halves" of the world but given that we are already 75% I don't think it's a good idea. My concern was exploration, but according to my calculations the closest piece of lands between the half's is like 3000 km apart, which is more than acceptable in terms of difficulty.
    75% Is lower than what we have on Earth so maybe we could increase it a little. It used to be higher but some islands got deleted and moving landmasses closer to the poles also lower it.

    3000 KM and the closest islands are easy to miss without sufficient knowledge of the area.

    About the archipelagos, one of them appear 2 times. Do you prefer 1 or 2? They can be modified to match with the rest. We can keep both but one of them will have to be modified.

    Edit: There are also a hell of a lot of islands as a result of my messy editing. Should we remove them or leave them?
    I wasn't sure what was the purpose. I guess we need islands but I'm not sure where to put them. Maybe small islands should be left for later, or for the individual mappers to decide. For sure, putting islands everywhere is not realistic. We need deep waters not just shallow oceans. But as weird as it sounds, making good islands is not always easy. Especially if you need a lot. We could keep them on a separate layer.

    Edit2: Given your image is at the top resolution I think we can just use that and clean up the land edges do you have one without the notes?

    No, right now my image is the same you used at first. It's in 72 DPI. To make it at 300 dpi you either need to make the map smaller by 4.16 times and then change resolution to 300 (that will stretch back to original pixel dimension with a huge loss in quality) or do another one from scratch (it's what I intended to do anyway). Also, I'm surprised that the map appear normally here since 50 megapixels exceed the limit. I guess that the resolution is also considered.
    At 300 DPI, we could go up to 7700 by 3850.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •