Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: Spelljammer Map of the Flow (WIP)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guild Apprentice
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bartmoss View Post
    Oh I am fine if you put it in as a small sphere, after all the map you have is not proportional either, right? I'd just like to be "on the map", really.
    Well, the spheres should be to scale (1mm = 1 billion miles - if you print it out at A0 size!) Distances in the flow are 'kind-of' proportional, according to The Broken Sphere the thickness of the river (as shown on a map) is proportional to its 'speed' (although this begs a question or two).

    Which raises a general question - should I split bi-directional rivers into two? (it might make some places a bit cluttered though).

    Quote Originally Posted by bartmoss View Post
    And I have heard of the Piazza, mainly because Big Mac was asking spelljammer stuff here a long time ago, but I doubt I should start to follow yet another forum.
    Ok, can I post a link to you site on The Piazza? I'm sure some of them might find it interesting.

  2. #2
    Guild Apprentice
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    And another update to the SVG version - I re-arranged a few things, moved some more spheres in, and, where a flow river has a travel duration, the thickness of the line represents its 'speed'.
    Last edited by Nerik; 06-11-2011 at 04:56 PM. Reason: Added detail

  3. #3
    Publisher Facebook Connected bartmoss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    904
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nerik View Post
    Well, the spheres should be to scale (1mm = 1 billion miles - if you print it out at A0 size!) Distances in the flow are 'kind-of' proportional, according to The Broken Sphere the thickness of the river (as shown on a map) is proportional to its 'speed' (although this begs a question or two).
    Ah, I see. - Well, I can easily work in an "alternate cosmology" which makes the Arth "sphere" better to handle.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nerik View Post
    Which raises a general question - should I split bi-directional rivers into two? (it might make some places a bit cluttered though).
    This iwll probably clutter the map up a lot.


    Quote Originally Posted by Nerik View Post
    Ok, can I post a link to you site on The Piazza? I'm sure some of them might find it interesting.
    Oh but of course! I post my stuff on the 'net so others may enjoy it (hopefully).

  4. #4
    Guild Apprentice
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bartmoss View Post
    Ah, I see. - Well, I can easily work in an "alternate cosmology" which makes the Arth "sphere" better to handle.
    Well, I've put it on the current version of the map at a size that assumes the 'shell' is just outside the oort cloud - if you shrunk the oort cloud you could reduce the radius by up to a half. (If the oort cloud was the same size as in the real would, the sphere would be over 10 metres wide!).
    Quote Originally Posted by bartmoss View Post
    This (doubled flow rivers) iwll probably clutter the map up a lot.
    I think you're right, I'll leave it.
    Quote Originally Posted by bartmoss View Post
    Oh but of course! I post my stuff on the 'net so others may enjoy it (hopefully).
    Ok, done.

  5. #5
    Guild Apprentice
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default

    Updated again, see first post for details.

  6. #6
    Guild Novice Sings-With-Spirits's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sunny Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Awesome work. You have no idea how long I've been looking for a map like this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •