Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: [WIP] Narridia, Revisited

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guild Adept atpollard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    331

    Default

    A general observation from drawing contour maps and drainage basins: The coast generally represents the contour drawn at the level of the water (since most water is flat). A convex (bulge out) coast represents a small hill, ridge or slightly higher local terrain. A concave (curves in) coast represents a small valley, swale or slightly lower local terrain. Since water flows downhill, rivers tend to collect in the low parts. As a result, most (but certainly not all) rivers intersect the coast at one of the concave parts. Look at the sample maps in my earlier post to see what I am talking about.

    A free observation of dubious practical use ... the general convex/concave shape of the coast tends to continue into the deeper water body. This affects local water temperatures and steers local weather patterns. As a result, concave areas of the coast recieve more rainfall and are more likely to be the place where a hurricane makes landfall. (based on observations of storm paths around the bulge on the west coast of Florida, just north of Tampa).

  2. #2
    Community Leader Lukc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Seoul, South Korea
    Posts
    1,573

    Default

    Actually, I think the southern continent is more app. half the size of Europe ...

  3. #3
    Guild Adept atpollard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    331

    Default

    OK, this could be my bad.

    The map on post #8 has two scales ... one for the map of Europe and the Medeterranean, and another scale at the bottom of the map. They are very different. Which is correct?

    I assumed that the medeterranean was shown at the same scale as your map, and your southern Continent is 3-4 times the area of Europe on the post #8 map.

    From the scale on your drawings, both of your continents combined are about the size of Europe.
    Last edited by atpollard; 02-14-2012 at 02:45 PM.

  4. #4
    Guild Journeyer Facebook Connected
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by atpollard View Post
    OK, this could be my bad.
    The map on post #8 has two scales ... one for the map of Europe and the Medeterranean and another scale at the bottom of the map.
    They are very different. Which is correct?

    I assumed that the medeterranean was shown at the same scale as your map, and your southern Continent is 3-4 times the area of Europe on the post #8 map. From the scale on your drawings, both of your continents combined are about the size of Europe.
    Well, they both are. Kinda. The Euro-scale came with the map, and is 500 miles. My scale is actually measured in leagues, although I never went out and said that. The blue line *above* that is the same distance, converted to miles, based off of the length of the Euro-scale. However, I think that this is a bit too large, and I had a different idea: Each subcontinent is roughly the size of Australia. I think this is slightly smaller than I had before.

    Although, interestingly the scales show up at different sizes, so I initially thought Australia would be smaller, but my math tells me they should be the same rough scale, roughly

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	narridia-vs-australia.png 
Views:	76 
Size:	51.6 KB 
ID:	42263

  5. #5
    Guild Journeyer Facebook Connected
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Ugh. I've been stumped for placenames, so to distract myself, I took a shot at few geo-features, namely Forests and Swamps. I'm not exactly pleased, but I thought I'd at least toss this out there:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	narridia-swamp+trees.png 
Views:	133 
Size:	246.0 KB 
ID:	42306

  6. #6
    Community Leader Lukc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Seoul, South Korea
    Posts
    1,573

    Default

    Hmm ... what about a style where more of the underlying map remains visible? For your style, such bright colours for features might kill your mountains and borders visually.

  7. #7
    Guild Journeyer Facebook Connected
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukc View Post
    Hmm ... what about a style where more of the underlying map remains visible? For your style, such bright colours for features might kill your mountains and borders visually.
    Yeah, I should have thought of that sooner. I did a test with the swamp texture at 50% opacity, and the forests at 75%. I like the faintness of the swamp, I think it looks better. On the other hand, the forests look worse, IMO.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	narridia-swampstrees-2.png 
Views:	87 
Size:	200.6 KB 
ID:	42308

    Edit: Meh, noone's replied, so instead of doing multiple posts, I'll just go ahead and make an addendum to this one.

    To get a better grasp of scale, I went online and grabbed a world projection map (Goode's Homolosine), and superimposed an outline of Narridia onto it. I scaled the continent down to the same scale (more or less) as the one involving Australia to fit it to the map. I must confess, I'm a bit surprised as to how small the scale is. When I was working with Europe, It seemed very very large in comparison, and with Australia it also seemed large, but not overwhelmingly so.

    Opinions?

    ------------------
    Edit: Oh, I'm an idiot. I forgot to upload the new image. Fixed:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	narridia-goode.png 
Views:	83 
Size:	1,005.3 KB 
ID:	42311
    Last edited by the-golem; 02-16-2012 at 09:12 AM.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •