Your labling could do with some work. (it's actually one of the hardest things to do well in cartography) Here are a few suggestions.

As Max said, the typefaces aren't the best choices. For map labels you want clear and consistent type. Try to stick to simple faces, and avoid mixing typefaces, particularly radically different ones. If you can get a good family of related typefaces, that works best. Filters and textures also tend to make labels hard to read.

For point labels, it's generally best to put the label beside the point rather than having it centred above or below. Try to be consistent when you can.

For areas, try to make the text a smooth but noticeable curve that spans the largest dimension of the area and try to spread it out with letter spacing rather than just making the text bigger or by stretching it.

The graticule (grid) looks out of place too. It doesn't really match the look of the map and besides that it looks like it's wrong. If it's meant to be a latitude/longitude graticule, and the map is as close to a pole as it appears to be, the graticule should not be square. It should be at a minimum, squeezed in horizontally (A secant cylindrical projection), or better radiating and concentric circular arcs (A conic projection) Other coordinate systems that might give a square graticule in high latitudes really don't fit the fantasy vibe of the map.

The forests really look good though.