Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Creative Commons clarification

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Redrobes View Post
    If somebody took one of my Thrub maps and made some more stuff for it then they couldn't sell it either.
    Right. And another corner case: Suppose 12rounds wanted to collect all of those character illustrations and tokens into a book and make that available on Lulu or RPGNow. Since most of the characters that have been posted here are based on information created for the CWBP, they also are bound by the NC-BY-SA license. I don't think any of us would begrudge 12rounds the right to distribute that work in such a way, but legally speaking, it would require getting individual permission from everyone who wrote source material in order to free it from the NC portion of the original license.

    I don't anticipate that anyone here would prosecute over this matter, but we cannot foresee the future. Forewarned is forearmed.

    Concerning the FT line of discussion: FT's license, along with the other ProFantasy products I have looked at, clearly states that maps created with the software are the sole property of the creator. ProFantasy makes no claim of ownership to anything except the art assets, which may be redistributed only in the form of a "finalized" image from which the symbols cannot be extracted. So that's not really an issue here--my concern is with the additional restrictions we placed on ourselves with the CC license.
    Bryan Ray, visual effects artist
    http://www.bryanray.name

  2. #2
    Administrator Redrobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,201
    Blog Entries
    8

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Midgardsormr View Post
    Since most of the characters that have been posted here are based on information created for the CWBP, they also are bound by the NC-BY-SA license.
    Maybe the accompanying text might be covered but there is nothing in his images that are based on anything covered by CWBP.

    There are a lot of weird stuff in this area. The one that I find odd is the way museums take photos of real and old art and make postcards of them and claim copyright on them.

    Only recently we were discussing a bestiary and there are some online made in year X at least 100yrs ago and the people publishing pages from it are claiming copyright on them. I am sure that they have no claim to make on the copyright of an image which is public domain.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •