Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Designing detailed Astronomy?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Administrator Redrobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,201
    Blog Entries
    8

    Post

    A lot of these theories that the moon orbits degenerate because of collision and stuff is based on a small but significant probability that there is a collision so running for a long time makes the orbit not possible. But if your in a fantasy setting then I would say that if the orbit is not probably going to cause that collision then just fudge it and say they don't collide even tho there is a small chance they might. It would be like saying that in my fantasy setting with earth and moon setup there are never any solar eclipses. It wouldn't drastically affect the game to make that assertion.

  2. #2
    Guild Journeyer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    PEI, Canada
    Posts
    213

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Redrobes View Post
    A lot of these theories that the moon orbits degenerate because of collision and stuff is based on a small but significant probability that there is a collision so running for a long time makes the orbit not possible. But if your in a fantasy setting then I would say that if the orbit is not probably going to cause that collision then just fudge it and say they don't collide even tho there is a small chance they might. It would be like saying that in my fantasy setting with earth and moon setup there are never any solar eclipses. It wouldn't drastically affect the game to make that assertion.
    Well, this is kind of the interesting thing about planets and their moons. Even Earth's moon is degrading and will eventually leave orbit (I forget if it is coming toward us, or going to move away and out of orbit) and ones that orbit around Mars are even more unstable.

    For a large moon like Earth's, that most likely starts as a major impact, then you ideally have it stable for several million years. But for small ones, they can be 'stable' for far shorter periods of time, even if they're only stable for hundreds of years before going back out of orbit they can still have an impact on society and life.

  3. #3
    Community Leader Facebook Connected Ascension's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Charles, Missouri, United States
    Posts
    8,392

    Post

    The Science Channel used to show Carl Sagan's "Cosmos" quite frequently until being retired this summer. One of his shows was about constellations and how they look totally different from different perspectives...not only in space but also in time and culture. Run the program backwards and Ursa Major doesn't look like Ursa Major at all. Viewed by the ancient Chinese, it was actually three figures (a dragon, a cart, and a tax collector) instead of a bear. Since everything is moving, over time the shape will change and for us the bear will become something else (although that time is thousands of years off).

    As to the moon retreating away from us, there was a History Channel show called "If We Had No Moon" (narrated by Patrick Stewart) that says the moon is moving away from earth at about 1 mile per year.
    If the radiance of a thousand suns was to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the Mighty One...I am become Death, the Shatterer of worlds.
    -J. Robert Oppenheimer (father of the atom bomb) alluding to The Bhagavad Gita (Chapter 11, Verse 32)


    My Maps ~ My Brushes ~ My Tutorials ~ My Challenge Maps

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •