Did you gloss over how it rejoins downstream?
Did you gloss over how it rejoins downstream?
If the radiance of a thousand suns was to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the Mighty One...I am become Death, the Shatterer of worlds.
-J. Robert Oppenheimer (father of the atom bomb) alluding to The Bhagavad Gita (Chapter 11, Verse 32)
My Maps ~ My Brushes ~ My Tutorials ~ My Challenge Maps
What about the nile-delta? ... thats a little more than little islands
Very nice, reminiscent of the maps from Lord of the Rings.
Looking forward to seeing more of your work.
I dub thee newly repped *bonk*
My Finished Maps | My Challenge Maps | Still poking around occasionally...
Unless otherwise stated by me in the post, all work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.
I really like this style. Look forward to seeing more of your work.
And have some more rep!
FantasyMapMaker.com - free fantasy maps for commercial or personal use ~ Campaign Cartographer 3 Review
So? It splits and if the land features were any different between the split and the confluence, it could go separate ways. That was just the first example I found. I'm sure there are others.
Because of how gravity works on rivers and the fact that two riverbeds being made of the exact same material and having the same inclination is astronomically rare, rivers don't fork downstream without soon rejoining (except in the short term before erosion and grade difference takes its toll).
Let's say you have a river that hits a point that splits off into two low points and decides to take both ways. At first you have a river forking off in two far separate directions and perhaps never rejoining. However the differences in slope and erosion on each branch means that eventually one out-erodes the other and, as water follows gravity, steals all of the others water. The result is usually one river and one dry riverbed.
Your picture is a perfect example of this. If you look close you can see the empty carved areas where it breached through but the flow lost out to another flow direction and dried up.
Periodic flooding can put the drying river into two different streams
Periodic flooding can also put the flooded river into two different streams
The point about not forking downstream is that it's not stable.
A stable river won't fork downstream.
That picture does indeed show a river forking but it is an exact text book example of the exception to this rule and this is because that river is heavily sedimented and is constantly changing its course. In a few years the river will not look like it does now and as has been stated all the little curves around the main flow show how it is drying up, switching into a new path and forming whats called 'OxBow' lakes as the curves get cut off. This isnt a stable river and its called 'braiding' - heres another wiki pic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wa...1_gobeirne.jpg
The thing is that these braids in the path are really all part of one river. You will not find that these braids stay separated and one will go to one coast and another to a different coast. They always are very transitory and always join back up and usually in a very small about of distance. If they dont join back up then one of the two main links to the sea will dry up.
Braiding always happens when there is a lot of sediment as when the river drops it then it switches direction. So you cant have braiding on any steep bit of river or where it might have just dumped off a load of sediment - like just after exiting a lake.
Most of the maps here are of country / continental sized areas where you just wont see this kind of thing.
The thing is that water always runs the easiest way. If there are two ways that are quite easy to go ... than one has to be exactly as easy as the other one for the water to split