Quote Originally Posted by Pixie View Post
Oh, Naima, I see it so clearly now! Sorry, I could have noticed it earlier from your comments on other threads, but... You are in fact using only one euler pole for all the plates, which is wrong - it would be a coincidence with, say, 0,000001% probability.

Each plate has its own movement, defined by an individual euler pole. In fact, because movement of the plates is always relative to other plates, scientists even use separate euler poles, within the same plate, depending on the pair of plates they are studying. Definitely not the same pole for all plates.

SO for each Plate I have to use one euler point or something like 3 -4 for all ? Also how's looking as is now even if I used only mainly one point? and having the relation from plate to plate to have a motion friction and speed description I think its going beyond the "visible" plausibility but it woudl be like defining even also how's the inside of the core, the magnetic field, gravity anomalies etc etc no?
As far as its working and realistic I am fine though .